Ingesting designs, difficulties, and you will motives among collegiate bisexual feminine

  • Post author:
  • Post last modified:November 14, 2023
  • Post comments:0 Comments

Ingesting designs, difficulties, and you will motives among collegiate bisexual feminine

Bostwick, W. B., McCabe, S. E., Horn, S., Hughes, T., Johnson, T., and you will Valles, J. Roentgen. (2007). J. In the morning. Coll. Repair. 56, 285–292. doi: /JACH.56.3.285-292

Brewster, Yards. Elizabeth., and you will Moradi, B. (2010). Sensed event from anti-bisexual bias: software advancement and you may testing. J. Couns. Psychol. 57, 451–468. doi: /a0021116

Brownish, T. (2002). A recommended make of bisexual name invention one elaborates into the experiential differences of women and you may men. J Bisexuality 2, 67–91. doi: /J159v02n04_05

Cashore, C., and you will Tuason, Yards. T. G. (2009). Negotiating brand new binary: title and public fairness to own bisexual and you may transgender somebody. J. Gay Lesbian Personal Serv. 21, 374–401. doi: 8720802498405

Choi, S. We., and you may La, S. (2019). Multicultural counseling inside the Southern area Korea: exploration and growth of people-specific competence evidence. Couns. Psychol. 47, 444–472. doi: 000019873338

Cipriano, Good. Elizabeth., Nguyen, D., and Holland, K. J. (2022). “Bisexuality Is not exclusionary”: an excellent qualitative examination of bisexual meanings and you will gender inclusivity issues certainly Plurisexual puerto rican vakre kvinner women. J Bisexuality twenty-two, 557–579. doi: 892

Colaizzi, P. (1978). Mental browse just like the a great phenomenologist opinions they. In: Roentgen. S. Valle and you will Meters. King (1978). Existential phenomenological choices for psychology. Open School Drive: Ny.

Cox, S., Bimbi, D. S., and you may Parsons, J. T. (2013). Examination of social get in touch with on the binegativity one of lesbians and you will gay dudes. doi: 96

Creswell, J. W., and you can Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and you can browse construction: Choosing among four tips, California: Sage E-books.

Davids, C. Yards., and you can Lundquist, Grams. Grams. (2018). Relationship themes and you may structures of bisexual people. Sex. Relatsh. Ther. 33, 6–twelve. doi: 421

Dworkin, S. L., and O’Sullivan, L. (2005). Genuine rather than wished initiation activities certainly one of an example out of college dudes: Scraping disjunctures in this old-fashioned men sexual programs. doi: 4490509552268

J Sex Res 42, 150–158

Dyar, C., Feinstein, B. An effective., and you will London area, B. (2014). Proportions of sexual name and you may fraction stress certainly bisexual female: the latest character off partner gender. Psychol. Sex. Orientat. Gend. Scuba divers. 1, 441–451. doi: /sgd0000063

Ess, Yards., Burke, S. E., and you will LaFrance, M. (2022). Gendered anti-bisexual bias: heterosexual, bisexual, and gay/lesbian Man’s desire up to now sexual positioning Ingroup and you will Outgroup members. J. Homosex. 1–18. doi: 618

Feinstein, B. A good., Benjamin, I., Dorrell, K. D., Foley, S. Age., Blumenau, H. S., Cragun, Roentgen. T., et al. (2022). An examination of perceptions for the bisexual individuals at intersections away from gender and you can race/ethnicity. J Bisexuality 22, 463–484. doi: 485

Feinstein, B. A., and you will Dyar, C. (2018). “Close and sexual dating experience certainly one of bisexual someone” into the Bisexuality: Concepts, research, and you will ideas for the new invisible sexuality. eds. D. J. Swan and you may S. Habibi (New york: Springer Around the world Publishing), 145–163.

Feinstein, B. An effective., Dyar, C., Bhatia, V., Latack, J. Good., and you will Davila, J. (2014). Desire to take part in close and you may sexual facts which have bisexual couples: gender and you can sexual positioning differences. Psychol. Sex. Orientat. Gend. Divers. step one, 255–262. doi: /sgd0000047

Feinstein, B. An excellent., Dyar, C., Bhatia, V., Latack, J. A good., and Davila, J. (2016a). Old-fashioned philosophy, perceptions into the bisexuality, and you can readiness to take part in intimate and you may sexual issues with a good bisexual partner. Arch. Sex. Behav. 45, 1535–1550. doi: /s10508-015-0642-x

Feinstein, B. A beneficial., Latack, J. An excellent., Bhatia, V., Davila, J., and you can Eaton, Letter. Roentgen. (2016b). Partnership involvement due to the fact a minority stress barrier for the gay/lesbian in the place of bisexual anybody. J Gay Lesbian Mental health 20, 237–257. doi: 401

J Bisexuality 13, 215–228

Flanders, C. Age., LeBreton, Meters. Age., Robinson, M., Bian, J., and Caravaca-Morera, J. An effective. (2017). Determining bisexuality: More youthful bisexual and pansexual mans sounds. J Bisexuality 17, 39–57. doi: 016

Flanders, C. Elizabeth., Robinson, M., Legge, Yards. M., and Tarasoff, L. A beneficial. (2016). Negative term event of bisexual or any other non-monosexual anyone: an excellent qualitative report. J Gay Lesbian Psychological state 20, 152–172. doi: 257

Leave a Reply